Skip to content
OrbitWorks Blog

One-time Second-in-Command Dick Cheney: An Examination on the Powerful Time in Office

The deceased US VP Dick Cheney, who passed away at the age of 84, was considered among the most significant incumbents of that office in American history. Although many VPs had to settle for marginal or ceremonial functions, Cheney wielded huge power during the presidency of George W Bush, to the point that he was commonly referred to as the "actual president".

Bush objected to this portrayal and stated the connection was more nuanced. He observed that Cheney was respectful, always referring to him in official appearances as the President, while he called him as Dick. Bush disputed even portrayals of their relationship as a partnership because it suggested that they were on equal footing. In spite of these objections, Cheney considered the relaxed president malleable on a whole raft of governmental choices.

A Period Following the Attacks

In charge of a group of neo-conservatives that encompassed Pentagon chief Donald Rumsfeld and Pentagon second-in-command Paul Wolfowitz, he strongly advocated the armed incursion of Iraq in 2003 in answer to the September 11th attacks on New York and Washington. When of the 9/11 strike, Bush had been taking part in a gathering at a elementary school in Florida. As Bush headed for a underground facility in Nebraska, Cheney took charge, commanding the destruction of any non-communicating airplanes approaching the US Capitol.

Cheney claimed the attacks transformed him, causing him to be determined on retribution. Together with other neo-cons, such as Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz, he lobbied for a takeover of Afghanistan in an effort to apprehend Osama bin Laden. Cheney then pressed fiercely for the military action of Iraq, even though there was insufficient indication of Saddam Hussein having involvement.

Disputed Actions

He showed no remorse about the invasion, in which an estimated 100,000 Iraqis lost their lives, and not about the harsh treatment of individuals apprehended after 9/11. He told CNN in 2015 that the Iraq invasion effort, which was predicated on inaccurate reports repeated by Cheney, was the proper path to take. "It proved to be the correct action to do then. I believed it then and I maintain that stance now."

Yet even at the time, there were dissenting voices at a high level about the botched execution of Iraq. One of the White House's own delegates to the Middle East, General Anthony Zinni (2001-03), was dismissed from the role. "I saw, as a baseline," he wrote later "true dereliction, carelessness, and irresponsibility: in the worst case, lying, unfitness, and graft."

Additional Factors

Cheney was not entirely responsible for the Iraq campaign. Before 9/11, Wolfowitz had called for such action. He had composed a memorandum outlining scenarios in which American interests might be endangered (encompassing "availability of vital raw materials, primarily Persian Gulf oil"). Wolfowitz had contended that "the US should be prepared to operate alone when cooperative measures cannot be orchestrated," explicitly referencing defense operations against Iraq.

Bush too had arrived in the presidency generally inclined on implementing what his predecessor had specifically avoided to do in 1991; remove Saddam. Following he had been dismissed by the White House, the finance chief Paul O'Neill revealed how, at the initial gathering of the National Security Council in January 2001, Bush had stated his plan of reducing America's involvement in the Middle East dispute and mooted defense operations against Iraq.

Bush carried a private grievance against Saddam, thinking he had been involved in a scheme to murder his parent, President George HW Bush, on a trip to Kuwait in 1993. He furthermore disliked that one of the largest hotels in Baghdad had a floor mural with a image of his father's face that everyone had to walk over.

Investigation Approaches

However it was Cheney who was among the most vehement supporting striking Iraq, frequently citing information documents that were both weak or completely deceptive. He backed what the Bush White House politely called as "advanced techniques", the employment of simulated drowning and harsh treatment.

Responding to a Senate analysis in 2014 that determined that no actionable intelligence had resulted from the interrogation methods, Cheney dismissed the findings as "full of crap". He informed Fox News: "We requested [the CIA] to implement measures and put in place initiatives to apprehend the individuals who murdered 3,000 of us on 9/11 and ensure it would not recur. That's exactly what they did and they deserve a lot of praise."

Public Image

Cheney reveled in nicknames given to him by critics such as the dark character and the dark figure, and by the notion that he was a shadow power directing Bush. In Peter Baker's 2013 book about the duo, Days of Fire: Bush and Cheney in the White House, Cheney is quoted as saying: "Am I the malevolent mastermind in the corner that nobody ever sees come out of his lair? It's a effective way to work, truthfully."

Corporate Connections

Debate over his corporate affiliations pursued him through his period as VP. Although he had limited background in corporate affairs but established relationships in defence, particularly in Saudi Arabia, he was invited to join Halliburton, one of the world's most substantial energy companies, in 1995 as leader and chief executive.

In 2000 he assumed the role of Bush's election partner for the presidency. Controversially, during the military campaign, Halliburton was granted US contracts worth substantial sums.

It significantly boosted his finances. His yearly earnings during his tenure at the firm grew from his $258,394 when he was defence secretary to over four million. When he left in 2000 he had a severance arrangement totaling more than $20m|twenty

Written by

Stephanie Cordova

A seasoned digital strategist with over a decade of experience in tech innovation and web solutions.

OrbitWorks Blog

Type to search articles.